|
These links to initiatives from the ACLU National office can assist you with more information
|
|
|
|
· Senate Bill 959 (Womack)
Summary: Prohibits gays from adopting children or being foster parents, even gays who are blood relatives to a child. Also prohibits unmarried heterosexual adults who live together from adopting a child unless they’re related to the child. That prevents godparents or family friends from caring for a child if the parents die or can’t keep the child.
Status: Failed in the House Judiciary Committee for lack of a motion in the morning of March 27; failed during a surprising motion by Rep. Jon Woods from Springdale with four aye votes made in the afternoon meeting of the committee. The other three aye votes were Reps. Aaron Burkes, Lowell; Lamont Cornwell, Benton; and John Paul Wells, Paris.
ACLU comment: We oppose this bill. It is mean-spirited, wrong-headed and unconstitutional. We must keep the calls coming till the session is over. Call or e-mail the House Judiciary Committee. Call or e-mail your representative to thank him or her for his or her "No" vote or "non vote"; call or e-mail the governor to voice your opposition. Thank Reps. David Johnson, Little Rock, Steve Harrelson, Texarkana, and David "Bubba" Powers from Hope, for their tough questions of the sponsor and others who testified for the bill.
Read More ...
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 16 May 2007 )
|
|
|
· House Bill 2353 (Woods, Greenberg)
Summary: Changes signature requirements for new political parties.
Status: Passed the House. Passed the Senate State Agencies and Governmental Affairs Committee. On Senate Calendar.
ACLU comment: This legislation stems from our successful lawsuit in federal court on behalf of the Green Part’s effort to get on the ballot last fall. While the bill is an attempt at clarifying issues on new parties, as written, the bill does not comply fully with Judge George Howard’s ruling. The bill would change Arkansas law so that both independent candidates and new parties needed 10,000 signatures of registered voters to get on the ballot (the judge struck down the law requiring new parties to gather getting 3% of all voters in the previous presidential election). But the bill reduces the signature gathering time from 150 to 60 days, and removes the cure period. Under the old scheme, a new party had to collect 161 signatures per day; under the current bill, a new party would have to collect 167 per day! Call the governor and your Senator to achieve ballot access for minority parties and keep Arkansas out of court.
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 16 May 2007 )
|
|
· Senate Bill 20 (Altes)
Summary: Establishes a program to monitor citizens’ use of prescription drugs.
Status: Now in the House Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee.
ACLU comment: We’ve objected to this bill from the outset as a gross invasion of privacy. It’s been amended a half-dozen times in the Senate, but our opposition persists. There’s simply no need for such a program, and any safeguards added will not allay our concerns. This covers a wide range of legal medications, including Ritalin, painkillers, and other common drugs.
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 16 May 2007 )
|
|
Vote NO on SB 959
What the bill does: SB 959 would categorically ban lesbian and gay Arkansans from adopting or serving as foster parents, even if they’re relatives of the child in question. It would also ban unmarried heterosexual couples who live together, unless they’re related to the child, which could prevent godparents or family friends from caring for a child if the parents die or can't keep the child.
Arkansas’s foster care system: The state of Arkansas already has a shortage of good adoptive and foster homes for the children in the child welfare system. This bill goes against standard social welfare practice and would only make the pool of potential good homes for these children in need even smaller. Please vote NO on SB 959!
- Child welfare experts oppose categorical bans and agree that all potential adoptive and foster parents should instead be subjected to a stringent individual screening process. Arkansas already puts every prospective parent through a criminal records check, health screening, and a home study. Anyone, gay or straight, that the state finds unfit to parent is already excluded.
- SB 959 would hurt the many children in need of homes in Arkansas. It would tie the hands of caseworkers and prevent them from making the placements they deem best for some children.
- SB 959 wouldn’t withstand a constitutional challenge in court. The Arkansas Supreme Court already unanimously held that there is no rational connection between excluding gay people from parenting and the health, safety or welfare of children, which means that such an exclusion can’t withstand a constitutional challenge. Why waste taxpayer money on another lawsuit that the state will undoubtedly lose because the relevant issues have already been decided by the Arkansas Supreme Court?
- What do Arkansans think? Arkansans agree that individual screening of all applicants, rather than blanket exclusions, is appropriate child welfare policy. According to a 2005 poll of 800 people conducted by the University of Arkansas, 65% said they approved of allowing a lesbian or gay man to adopt a child if the court found that person fit in all other ways to become an adoptive parent.
- Gay parents and heterosexual parents—the evidence: 25 years of research on lesbian and gay parents and their children shows that gay people are just as capable of being good parents as heterosexuals and the children raised by gay parents are just as well-adjusted. Not a single study has found any harm to children from being raised by gay parents.
- What do Arkansas children’s advocates think? All of the major Arkansas groups dedicated to children's health and welfare -- Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, the Arkansas Psychological Association, and the Arkansas chapter of the National Association of Social Workers -- recognize that gay people can be equally good parents and, thus, oppose restrictions on parenting by lesbians and gay men. All of the national children's health and welfare groups agree too, including the American Academy of Pediatricians, the American Psychological Association, the National Association of Social Workers, and the Child Welfare League of America.
ACLU of Arkansas - March, 2007
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 14 March 2007 )
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
· House Bill 2170 (Abernathy)
Summary: Repeals Arkansas’s participation in the federal REAL ID Act of 2005.
Status: In House Public Transportation Committee.
ACLU comment: The ACLU is doing what it can to support this bill. This federal legislation forced states into issuing nationally standardized driver’s licenses and required states to enter the information into nationally accessible data bases. Aside from privacy concerns, states are balking at the financial costs. Congress allocated no additional money for the states to comply with the law.
--------
· Senate Bill 847 (Salmon)
Summary: Guarantees a sexual assault victim access at an emergency room to an emergency contraceptive.
Status: Awaiting action in Senate Public Health, Welfare and Labor Committee.
ACLU comment: The ACLU supports this bill and urges you to contact your senators and representatives in support.
--------
· Senate Bill 871 (Trusty) and House Bill 2768 (Rosenbaum)
Summary: Requires notice to patients that abortions can’t be forced on them by anyone. SB 871 requires providers to post signs. HB 2768 includes the admonishment as a part of the “informed consent” law.
Status: Both remain in the Senate public health, welfare and labor committee and House public health committee, respectively
ACLU comment: The ACLU opposes both bills as being meaningless. They’re aimed at making doctors look like predators.
|
|
Last Updated ( Wednesday, 16 May 2007 )
|
|
| | << Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>
| | Results 1 - 9 of 18 |
|
|
|